![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
MAJOR WIP
a lot of neocities users keep a diary, and it's pretty neat to see what's going on with people in a way that offers more in-depth entries past twitter or facebook status updates. but... there's a fair amount of options in how to go about it
i'd like to take a look at various digital journaling methods i've seen used, and i suppose compare and contrast their pros and cons. hopefully, if you want to get into the world digital journaling, this article will help you figure out what method is right for you! note: a lot of this is your mileage may vary! for example, i personally find engagement important so i don't feel like i'm writing to the ether, but maybe you don't care about that. ie, what's a pro to me might be a con or "so what?" to you
these are the primary methods i'll be taking a look at:
- manual .html files
- tumblr
- bearblog
- cutenews
- dreamwidth (+ similar, such livejournal, insanejournal, etc.)
manual html
this is what a lot of neocities users think of when they hear "diary"
pros:
- comments (sort of)
- tagging (sort of; you can, but you have to do it manually)
- complete and utter customization of everything
- privacy (sort of? don't share the link if you don't want it found sorta deal)
cons:
- manually coding and uploading updates (and everything else)
- no rich text editor or hybrid option, so everything has to be hard coded
- networking is more difficult (depending on where you're hosted you can technically have followers like neocities, but you still have to manually set up things like comments
- it's more difficult to allow readers to subscribe to keep up with your updates (it's doable, but extra steps you have to take)
- urls can be annoying depending on how you set it up ex subdomain.domain.org/diary/page.html over simple subdomain.domain.org setup
my personal consensus: totally fine for it's purpose, and total customization is a big plus, but there's better methods out there
twitter (aka timeline microblogging)
pros:
- convenient, doesn't require manual coding or uploading (just hit send)
- allows reposting of similar content
- access via mobile app or desktop
- can make your profile friends-only
- allows direct uploading of media such as images and videos
- you get notifications when another user engages with your content or follows you
- sort of offers bookmarking via likes
- but can be a con in that likes in themselves operate like a timeline
- block function
cons:
- very limited customization
- barely any ability to make a profile literally where "carrd culture" comes from
- there's a character limit for each tweet
- no static tagging; hashtags can post in a tag but once your post is buried good luck finding it later, and then that means it ends up in a site-wide tag, not just tagging for your personal usage
- algorithms make it difficult to discover others and be found
- there's typically ads on your timeline presented to you and your audience
- speaking of ads, they're often targeted... ie, companies harvest data on you
- notorious for drama
twitter is fun, but it's best for fast and loose musings and browsing other media. it's biggest appeal is retweeting to get content such as that fanart or meme you liked on your own timeline - but then again, if you can't find it later, it begs the question of what the point of that is
while anyone can vent (i've defo used it for venting) making threads is in a way more frustrating than being able to make a full on post about what you're discussing
personal consensus: not ideal for in-depth journaling and better suited to being more of a casual thought-stream
cutenews
still working on this
bearblog
admittedly, i've not used this, because i haven't felt a need to. but based on what i see of it, it seems like a more convenient version of html. i'll get around to covering this better in the future
dreamwidth
i saved the best for last 😤 i kid, i kid. it's all up to personal preference. but i'd be lying if i denied having a bias
pros:
- convenient, doesn't require manual coding or uploading (but allows manual coding if you'd like)
- allows for easy networking via built-in friending, commenting, and subscriptions
- allows non-users to comment without an account if you'd like
- also allows rss feed subscriptions if you'd like
- various privacy settings; entries can be completely private, semi-public to friends, or completely public
- large character limit for each post (10,000)
- allows for different icons and easy switching of them in entries and comments
- mood themes, babey!!!
- offers communities, so while your primary account works as a personal journal, it also basically acts as access to various forums as well
- notifications when another user engages with your content
- timeline feature (reading page) to see what folks you follow are up to
cons:
- smaller community due to lack of popularity
- not as "modern" as other platforms
- does not allow direct uploading of media; you have to have urls for images. technically does offer some image hosting, but only offers 500mb of storage
- workarounds are using public image hosts like imgur and built-in share functions for things like youtube videos. using html or rich text editor to get media onto the post itself is like a 30 second difference in comparison to direct uploading imo
- i personally find 100% customizing my theme to be a lot more involved. it's doable, but definitely a "working on it a while" situation
- this might be offset by there being so many base styles, and them having a ton of built-in options anyway?
- there's a cost to upload custom mood themes ): they gotta cover their server costs somehow though, and without ads supporter features like this aren't something i can be mad at
- because tags are isolated, it can be a little difficult to "get word out"
- no resharing of content that i'm aware of, but you can add other users content to your memories to find later (akin to bookmarks)
still working on this